Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Oleksa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Oleksa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability, no sourcing. Subject does not meet notability criteria. Article is utterly unsourced. User:PAWiki (talk) 03:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Shouldn't this be transcluded to the 27th instead of the 26th in the log? czar · · 03:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should, so I have moved it. Good catch! Stalwart111 05:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- At best weak keep, buit probably delete: his notability is at best weak. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. Unable to find RS for subject. Transcendence (talk) 22:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.