Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Meacher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep Kotepho 03:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Meacher[edit]

hopeless soapbxing of non-notable persons with minority fringe POVs--IPO 01:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete as above--IPO 01:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, very notable English politician. Look at his BBC News profile [1]. Bad faith nomination from IPO against 9/11 critics. --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as per TBC and BBC. -- Jeandré, 2006-04-23t01:30z
Speedy Keep, bad-faith nom Badgerpatrol 02:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Difficult to see this as other than POV nomination Dlyons493 Talk 02:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as bad faith WP:DISRUPT nom. Clearly notable politician by WP standards. Шизомби 02:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. I am harded pressed to remember I worse nomination for deletion. --Bduke 02:59, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, bad faith AFD, notable politician. --Ter e nc e Ong 03:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.