Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Manuel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 09:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Manuel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass GNG or WP:ENT. Essentially a promo paage maintained by an SPA. Pipsally (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Pipsally, we can see that it's not a well written article but are we sure he fails GNG?[1] • Мастер Шторм (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks, I can use Google too, which is why he's AfD'd. There's no evidence of real notability.Pipsally (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Pipsally (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Has a decent amount of credits but nothing significant to satisfy WP:NACTOR. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 01:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.