Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lorin Reed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – czar 22:23, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Lorin Reed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable dermatologist. A small number of minor publications--none cited by more than17 papers, which is trivial in this subject. Appearing on TV programs merely shows his efforts at self-promotion. DGG ( talk ) 14:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More inclined to delete as my searches found no considerable coverage and searches (News, Books, highbeam, thefreelibrary and Scholar) found nothing aside from two links at Books. I'm not an expert of academia so I don't usually comment but I will if I outstandingly see something. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Note that a good chunk of the text here is from http://www.michaellorinreed.com/about_dr_reed.html. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:32, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.