Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lloyd (special effects artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Lloyd (special effects artist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, does not pass WP:CREATIVE, nomination for the award is great but winning is better. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are endless articles that have less info about people getting nominated for Oscars that only have a few films. Wgolf (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there is but I haven't seen those. I'm sorry it's not personal I just happened to see this one created . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well there are more questionable ones I see all the time, mostly Bollywood people but I have no clue what to say about them (I added this guy after seeing a link for a DAB page so I decided to do it), there are far more questionable ones, this one should count as one to stay.Wgolf (talk) 03:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hate bollywood articles, they are some of the most heavily promotional articles onsite. Holy cow you'd think those people invented the wheel the way the articles are written! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I try to mark them but they always find a way to weasel around them.

Well there are tons of pages like this one but with less info, just go look under the visual effects :nominations, I tend to try to add people with more (like ILM people for example), but yeah this guy I :just did add. Wgolf (talk) 03:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:ANYBIO. Being nominated for an Academy Award would easily pass WP:GNG too. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lugnuts the key to that sentence is nominated several times. This person was only nominated once and there is a lack of coverage in reliable sourcing. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 07:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Being nominated for an Academy Award would easily pass WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear is there a specific guideline I'm not familiar with Academy awards or is this a WP:IAR rationale? I'm just not seeing the significant coverage. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's no specific guidance as such, but the Academy Awards are the highest accolade a filmmaker could ever be nominated for. Here are two similar deletions that ended in keep (note that I created both articles in the first place). Douglas Zoty and Paul Markwitz. They both follow a similar pattern. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Notable, minimally per Oscar nomination. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per nom. The nomination is enough to pass additional criteria. A special effect artist may not get wide media coverages. Iniciativass (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Errr I nominated to deleted lol. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, I have to admit, that did make me laugh too! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.