Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kallman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Kallman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic BLP1E, and largely unsourced at that. Alison ^❤ 02:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)o[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A7 as received scrutiny for joking is not a claim to significance. LGA _talk^edits 04:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. It is truly sad that this crappy little hit piece has remained here for seven years. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E....William 13:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete. maybe salt? per WP:BLP1E. The article serves to disparage the subject and is a WP:Soapbox to rally off-wiki action and create publicity over the incident. There is nothing to see here and the article has no place on wikipedia. Regrettably, with all those news articles, I cannot honor the A7. Maybe someone bolder than I will get to it before I despeedy. Dloh cierekim 14:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.