Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson's personal life and controversies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 07:25, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Jackson's personal life and controversies[edit]
No reason to have this separate from the Michael Jackson article. Trying to assume good faith, but this seems like an attempt to suppress controversies about Jackson from the main article.--chris.lawson 06:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with extreme prejudice. POV fork, an attempt to whitewash the main Michael Jackson article by removing all criticism to another page. android79 07:07, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Jasmol 07:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The main Michael Jackson article now contains sections on Personal Life and Controversies, meaning this article doesn't need to be here and should be removed. Street walker 08:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Street Walker. Unnecessary article. Capitalistroadster 08:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:Content forking. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Sjakkalle. The content used to be in the main Michael Jackson article, and there's no reason why it shouldn't remain there. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 13:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. - Mgm|(talk) 15:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An article which focused on Michael Jackson's personal life and controversies would not be inherently a POV fork. However, the announcement of the article's creation here shows that the intent was exactly what the nomination described: an attempt to surpress controversies from the main article. There is no justification for the claim "This article (Michael Jackson) is only for Michael Jackson's musical career." -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. POV fork.--Sean|Black 23:27, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No need for a separate article. *drew 14:48, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.