Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Johns
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Michael J. Johns[edit]
Contested speedy. I don't believe this bio sufficiently asserts notability. Further, it's completely unsourced. NawlinWiki 20:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, fails WP:BIO. Today be Interrrnational Tal kie like a pirrrate day! --Nishkid64 21:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 22:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - "He can be contacted by email at any of the three colleges he teaches at." If this was written by one of his students, then he wasn't a very good teacher. (Should be "at which he teaches.") --72.75.117.73 22:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability asserted. There are plenty of history professors in the world. -- Necrothesp 23:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - If this guy has two book contracts from commercial publishers, then he would qualify as "notable". However, this says he is set to release. That sounds like he plans to self-publish, which is not notable. RickReinckens 02:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Frescard 02:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I'm not sure there is any credible claim of notability. Pascal.Tesson 18:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.