Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holyk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Holyk[edit]
- Michael Holyk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet, WP:FILMMAKER, and cannot find any reliable independent sources which talk specifically about the subject. France3470 (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Very little in the way of sources; BBC coverage includes a brief interview with the subject--perhaps five seconds on camera-- and the Prince's Trust link appears not to mention the subject by name. The film is a more apt candidate for notability than the director. Determination of article's creator to remove maintenance tags without answering issues suggests likelihood of conflict of interest. 99.11.7.81 (talk) 16:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.