Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holt (designer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 02:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Holt (designer)[edit]

Fails WP:N, WP:V. Wizardman 20:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion. With all due respect for Holt, he is not particularly a notable figure in the world. Lack of detail and everything you yourself pointed out. I don't see any particular reason to oppose this request. Not unless someone performs a miracle act to turn the article around -_- A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 21:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - He appears to be a significant stage and set designer. I have no familiarity in the area so I may be misinterpreting what I find. Admittedly these are more in the way of drive-by mentions, but [1] and [2] specifically credit him as the set designer. And [3] specifically calls out his set design as part of the play's review. Additionally, he is a published authoer and his work on stage design is significant enough to be added as reading material for drama course curriculum. [4]. -- Whpq (talk) 13:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per A Prodigy. Stifle (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.