Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holmes (motocross)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Holmes (motocross)[edit]

Non-notable purported motocross rider. While sources are tough to pore over, it looks as if almost none at all outside of Wiki mirrors exist for Mr. Holmes, let alone reliable ones, and even applying WP:ATHLETE to this article, the article never alleges that he competed beyond amateur county competitions. Article is the sole Wikipedia activity of User:Bchillin54, its creator. Fails WP:BIO, WP:V. RGTraynor 14:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no significant coverage from independent reliable sources (after getting him confused with a skydiver for a while). Nothing to suggest that this would pass WP:ATHLETE guidelines. Also appears to be an autobiography judging from the intimate details provided.--Beloved Freak 15:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 15:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources to estblish notability. Based on the article text, he didn't really make the step up to competing in the top level of his sport. -- Whpq (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As said above, notability not established per limited coverage in reliable sources. —97198 talk 06:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments about lack of notability. -- Quartermaster (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.