Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gleeson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Gleeson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long time journo in the mainly pre-web days who apparantly covered lots of big stories on everything but himself, but now is a (non-notable) PR guy. Has written one book, and shouldn't be confused with the Melbourne sports reporter born 1969 of the same name who's written lots of books and newspaper stories and could almost have an article on him. The-Pope (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 15:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nomination shows a lack of sources demonstrating this Michael Gleeson is notable. LibStar (talk) 07:28, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.