Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Fullerton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per nom withdrawn. Tyrenius 03:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Michael Fullerton

Michael Fullerton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable artist per WP:BIO, no references or sources. Videmus Omnia 01:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Nom withdrawn in light of new sources. Videmus Omnia 03:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Keep. Non-notable. No references. Info in article not verifiable (e.g., Tate exhibition). Good at self-promotion, though. I take that back. The Tate exhibit wasn't on his bio. I should have done a separate search. Sunray 01:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Why do you think he's good at self-promotion? Tyrenius 02:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Strong keep per easily verifiable shows at the Tate.[1] These are "Art now", which is a solo show of the artist's work, and "Triennial" which is a survey of the most important work for the last three years. That took 30 seconds to find out. Tyrenius 02:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Easy keep Article demonstrated notability when nominated - more so now. Johnbod 02:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Tyrenius 02:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.