Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ernest Sweet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 00:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ernest Sweet[edit]

This seems to be an autobiography (created by Mesweet (talk · contribs) of a non-notable person. All the books he has published are published by lulu.com which is a self-publisher. Everything seems to be borderline notable, but nothing is asserted through reliable sources. Metros 01:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- David Eppstein 02:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. ~ Wiki hermit 03:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Self publishing does not make you notable. CitiCat 04:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete self-published author, vanity article. Guy (Help!) 11:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. :) Chetblong 16:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just not seeing the notability or sources. Please don't take it personally. --Bachrach44 18:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per all of the above. --RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 05:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no independent sources. Shouldn't speedy because of the assertion that CTV is notable, but Snowballing would have the same effect. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 00:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, then how about my substituting "Delete with all due haste" for "Speedy delete?" :) --RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 16:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.