Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Durtnall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | express _ 17:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Durtnall‎[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article paid for by the subject with no real notability beyond being a chiropractor. Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability presented in the article, and none found at Google News or Google Scholar. --MelanieN (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because this guy is not notable. The article was created by a SPA. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 04:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not satisfy the WP:GNG. No significant coverage in any sources via Google Books or Google Scholar. For clarification, these two revisions were paid for. I have no reason to believe the creation of the article was paid for though. WilliamH (talk) 01:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You could be right, I suspect it was originally written by the subject or more likely an employee of the subject, though.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 13:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.