Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Collings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Collings[edit]
- Michael Collings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A finalist of Britain's Got Talent who hasn't gone on to gain notability since appearing in the show. I don't believe having hits on YouTube makes someone notable. Has apparently released singles but all failed to chart. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and is WP:1E. Has a list entry, which suffices for this act. –anemoneprojectors– 08:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Promotional bio for non-notable musician, probably written by his management company (Waited99 is possibly Dan Waite, the article subject's management contact). Note that article creator also makes a point to include management company info in the titles of all related images he uploads. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 16:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Some people have used a Got Talent appearance as a springboard to a successful career. He doesn't seem to be one of them though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - spectacularly fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Looks NN to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.