Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael A. Amos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael A. Amos[edit]

Michael A. Amos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor with very questionable notability-also a auto bio Wgolf (talk) 02:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I was able to verify the award here, so this could probably give some notability but not enough to keep on that basis alone. The coverage of this is fairly light, though, so I'll need to do some more research before I'd be comfortable saying that it absolutely would give partial notability on here, as Wikipedia is fairly strict about what awards it considers notable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  05:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  05:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  05:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. His roles are all minor and he hasn't received any coverage for his acting career. He's predominantly known for his book, which other than the Heritage Toronto Award, hasn't received any notice from places Wikipedia would consider reliable. The award does look to be somewhat discerning, but the coverage for it is incredibly light and would not be the type that would give absolute notability, meaning a keep on the award alone. He is related to notable people, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED and this did not translate into any coverage for Amos. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I simply found nothing better than this and this. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete - non-notable bio listed at BLP noticeboard as created by subject of the bio. Original Research non-notable bio, self published sources. 97.126.235.119 (talk) 03:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.