Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Heat 2015 Offseason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miami Heat 2015 Offseason[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is unsourced and terribly written. I can't find any coverage in independent sources to meet WP:GNG and it doesn't appear to meet any criteria at WP:NSPORT either. Even if sources can be found, it may need to be deleted per WP:TNT. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete any relevant information can be covered at 2014–15 Miami Heat season and/or 2015–16 Miami Heat season. Lepricavark (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because the whole article is awash in reports of subjective impressions and people's emotional states, WP:OR, not WP:NPOV: "gut clinching [sic]", "best player", "had the Miami heat fans worried", "The major player who fans wanted to stay", "Fans started to doubt", "This had fans discouraged", "Out of nowhere the sky started to clear up slowly", etc. Perhaps these would be appropriate in an article titled "Angst among Miami Heat fans during the 2015 offseason". But that wouldn't be a suitable article for this site. Largoplazo (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to the season article; there is no reason for this to stand alone.Jacona (talk) 02:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should not be a standalone article. All relevant information should be placed in proper season articles.--Rockchalk717 08:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic original content. Jrcla2 (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.