Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Talerico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Shimeru (talk) 07:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Talerico[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable child actress who, according to IMDb, has been on one episode of a TV show. Severely fails WP:ENT; PROD contested without comment. Glenfarclas (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article celebrating her first role? Waaaay too soon for this article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — The article does not pass WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 21:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep No, she probably doesn't pass WP:ENT, but I would argue keep by invoking a bit of WP:IAR. She has been cast in the title role of a Disney Channel sitcom along the lines of Hannah Montana and Wizards of Waverly Place, and the entire show revolves around her character (only one episode appears on IMDB because only one episode has aired). She passes GNG, though she didn't when this AFD started; Articles are being published now because her tv series premieres on Sunday. (Sources: LA times, NY Daily News, Pittsburgh Post-Gazzette (Unfortunately no interviews. she just 10 months old ;])). And it is very likely that, either this season or the next, Disney will film a TV movie around the series (as they have for all their other series) or have her guest star in one of their other series.

That said, the article is somewhat of a vandalism target and I'm uncertain about about creating a BLP on someone who may not even be able to speak. So, while those previous reasons aren't reasons to delete and I can see why the article could be kept, I'm willing to wait until she gets a second role. liquidluck✽talk 20:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It has published sources, which does establish notability. I think the only problem with them is that we have to wikify the references. Minima c (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep April 4 has passed an presumably the show has been aired. I'll confess I did not watch....but that fact, combined with the sources, make her notable. Whether she was actually notable last week, before the show aired, is an interesting academic questions for Wikipedians, but not particularly relevant here. Vartanza (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ENT by a long shot. Her career simply isn't developed enough. Petitscel (talk) 21:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.