Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Dolan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Dolan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Subject has written several books but received no significant RS coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 17:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete Their strongest claim to fame would seem to be as a TV presenter, but they're failing our notability tests there too. Of course, any coverage in The Daily Prophet or even The Quibbler could change that. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Quis separabit? 19:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep easy WP:GNG pass for me. First, her book The Gift was a best seller in the UK [1] [2] ; second, "her last solo TV show – screened on Boxing Day – was beaten only by Match of the Day in the ratings" [3] ; third, although she has not been in the spotlight for some time now, "RS coverage" remains easy to find The Guardian The Times. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 04:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Wikipedia page as it stands now looks like a AfD, I glanced at the citations Biwom left and they should be on the page, then lets see where we are. Sgerbic (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss Biwom's sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails the high requirement for coverage of fringe figures.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.