Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan School Of Business Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan School Of Business Management[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After receiving a spam email offering me a four day "Special Executive MBA" I was very surprised to find a Wikipedia article on this "school". Article was created by a blocked sock abusing user and the prod tag was removed by another blocked sock-puppeteer. Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:ORG. Only sources are primary sources or PR puff pieces. Amazed it's lasted this long. Glen (talk) 07:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any coverage of this in sources besides a few trivial passing mentions --Tristario (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - in addition to very dubious claims to notability on the page which do not appear to be backed up by any RS I can find, there also seems to be significant areas of misinformation. Specifically the claim that the qualifications are awarded by the OTHM does not seem to be based on anything as the subject is not in the database of centres and the link to the NCC is broken 1. I can't see any evidence for the claim that their qualifications lead to degrees or masters qualifications from top UK universities. The address on the WP page appears to be a service office 1 which might be understandable if they weren't claiming to be an educational establishment. I just checked the UK gov site and they are not listed as being able to award degrees and in another database is not listed as being a sponsoring body, so cannot recruit foreign students and support their visa applications. I therefore think that their website is at best misleading and having a WP page may well be giving them unwarranted credibility where that is not deserved. JMWt (talk) 09:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.