Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Community Church of New York
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 09:20Z
Metropolitan Community Church of New York[edit]
- Metropolitan Community Church of New York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete non notable, non verifiable. The fact that it reaches out to the GLBT community isn't notable, as there are several other churches that do that (UCC, UU, etc) Адам Райли Talk 20:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would support a possible mergeinto Metropolitan Community Church. --Адам Райли Talk 16:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, lots of media coverage.--Ioannes Pragensis 21:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This article doesn't mention anything about media coverage. The notability has not been established anywhere in the article. --Адам Райли Talk 06:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The MCC exists in to minister to the GLBT community - the best-known such denomination in the US (at least). -- Bpmullins | Talk 21:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The religious denomination itself has an article (Metropolitan Community Church); however, it may be that an individual church within the denomination is not encyclopedic. I fail to see how this particular church is "non verifiable" (it does not seem incapable of verification), but I do see how the article fails to assert notability or encyclopedic value. On that, I'll remain neutral on this AfD for now. Agent 86 23:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per Ioannes Pragensis; --Mhking 23:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ioannes. Edison 05:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Otto4711 05:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.