Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metro Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Star[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All refs including the official link are dead links, thus notability has not been established. My Google search came up empty too. Wbm1058 (talk) 22:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 01:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:DEADLINK, the nominator's rationale for deletion is not valid because just because a publication is not on the Internet does not mean that its assertions no longer meet reliable source criteria. However, I created this article some time ago and in the process wrote the newspaper and asked them for other sources reviewing them. It seems to have been a small newspaper with a weak foundation and which has now gone defunct. In retrospect, I do not think this newspaper was ever notable by Wikipedia standards. Irrespective of the official link and references being dead, I say delete because the article's subject would not be notable even if the links were live. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Blue Rasberry. I haven't been able to find sufficient coverage to justify notability. Andrew³²⁷ 20:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.