Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metameaning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 02:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Metameaning[edit]
neologism that claims to be a branch of philosophy, but really just refers to one sparse website. Googling for 'metameaning' largely pulls references to the Wikipedia page or that web site. Sukiari 01:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Epistemology is the study of the meaning of meaning but it is sloppy to state there is actually a term for the meaning of meaning, which would be a recursive headache Ruby 01:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google yields mostly self-referential (no irony intended) and Wiki references. Hardly accepted, even for a neologism. --Kinu 02:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 02:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is basically an advertisement for a non-notable website. The article itself is superfluous, as (a) philosophers do not actually use the term 'metameaning', and (b) the investigation of the nature (or "meaning") of meaning is already covered in philosophy of language, semantics, and related articles. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advert. TheRingess 06:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Prodego talk 14:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. —This user has left wikipedia 18:50 2006-02-05
- Delete per Dbtfz Bad ideas 05:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. --Wingsandsword 08:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.