Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MessageLabs (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MessageLabs[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and Merge No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. The mention that it was ordered by a court to produce a court-approved press release does not meet the criteria for notability. Information should be merged with Symantec. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt this repetitive corporate blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. The company / product was not significant enough to warrant a merge, so I'd "oppose" that. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notable. Satisfies GNG easily due to coverage in the sources cited in the article, GNews, GBooks, GScholar and elsewhere. Deletion would violate ATD, PRESERVE and R, because there is a valid target for merger and redirection. James500 (talk) 04:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

??!There are zero citations in Google Scholar. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

There are papers by MessageLabs that have been cited by others. So for example, their Annual Security Report for 2010 has 22 citations. I agree that most of their notability is from sources outside GScholar, but having their papers cited does contribute a little. James500 (talk) 07:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- advertising brochure for a non-notable company. Reyk _YO! 11:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.