Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesh Flinders (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to lonelygirl15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mesh Flinders[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly unnotable-- most of the information is referring to insignificant short films featured at relatively minor festivals. Being one of three people to create lonelygirl doesn't seem notable, and the fact is that this reads like a promo piece

Note: Previous deletion nomination was from 2009 and was apparently tainted from being posted on a lonelygirl fansite.
Note 2: The other two creators of lonelygirl have pages which redirect to the article of a company.

‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 17:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to lonelygirl15, the most prominent work. I don't see anything else being that notable. It appears he left the group before EQAL was formed so redirecting to EQAL doesn't make sense. Nothing else that is notable. Would be okay with re-creating article if he has other notable works that aren't sourced by self-promotional sites. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to lonelygirl15 per AngusWOOF. GretLomborg (talk) 04:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per the two above users. Sounds good to me. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 12:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.