Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merritt Kopas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merritt Kopas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks sufficient support to establish notability. Majority of references lack independence; others are primary. Article lacks independent secondary support. reddogsix (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have to confess complete bewilderness as to why somebody would write a game called Consensual Torture Simulator, but it takes all sorts and Kopas does turn up in multiple news and book hits. I have dropped some better sources into the article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ritchie, when commenting on a BLP like this, please constrain your comments to notability matters, not your "bewilderness" about the subject's art form. Not least also because BLP subjects pay attention. — Scott • talk 23:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Scott: I think that came out wrong, all I meant was I've tried to improve the article, just it's been difficult as it's on a subject I'm unfamiliar with. I'm certainly not trying to belittle Ms Kopas' efforts at all and that I don't understand things is my problem, not theirs. Please give them my apologies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Fringe indie notable. Further coverage.[1][2][3] - hahnch e n 20:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.