Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meredith Gleklen Gardner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Should have read more closely before relisting. Jenks24 (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meredith_Gleklen_Gardner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wrote this article at the time I thought it was needed. here are the main reasons we would like to have it deleted. 1. poorly sourced, misrepresentation of the individual after research and review. 2. Article vulnerable to vandalism due to ongoing court case. 3. no need for notability article on living persons. Perhaps in the future an AFC on individual would be written about. Please proceed with AFD JuneHazinek (talk) 07:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC) JuneHazinek[reply]

Delete - Fails GNG. A failed effort at self-promotion or something... Carrite (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 14:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.