Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercy Malick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 06:44, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy Malick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for Non notable bit part actress. Does not have multiple significant roles in notable productions. Amongst the "best known for" is single episodes in longrunning series, not the stuff of notability. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of the actress. Probable UPE. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article creator has removed the worst of the promotion [1]. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:34, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft delete A mention in Huffington Post isn’t enough for an article. Trillfendi (talk) 00:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.