Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercury Messenger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mercury Messenger[edit]
- Mercury Messenger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. Tagged as spam for months. Tagged for cleanup almost two years. This article does not meet our criteria and is not getting any attention. Searching for sources for both Mercury Messenger and dMSN does not find non-trivial sources. Several books mention it as an alternative MSN client for Macs, but this is a mere mention in lists, not significant coverage to this software. Miami33139 (talk) 19:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 19:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to locate any coverage in reliable sources. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Haakon (talk) 22:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I too am unable to locate significant coverage. That's the bottom line. JBsupreme (talk) 05:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.