Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercenary Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mercenary Technology[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A WP:BEFORE only showed passing mentions of the company in connection to games it worked on. Since the company does not produce original games, just provides support or port development, a navigation list on grounds of being a "creative force" makes little sense. IceWelder [✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Don't delete. Though the company doesn't meet the notability guidelines the article is still able to remain as more people will be able to discover the developer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TriforceTropical (talk • contribs) 14:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC) [reply]

That's not the point of Wikipedia. IceWelder [✉] 14:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet vote struck. -- ferret (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources, i.e., sources about the company itself, not just being mentioned as having ported games in routine coverage. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 19:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.