Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meneka Das

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meneka Das[edit]

Meneka Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of an actress who does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. She has played small roles, mostly uncredited, in a number of films. Her only claim to fame is that she worked in Bohemian Rhapsody (film) that won an academy award. Article has only one source which is not independent of her either. Google search only shows passing mentions but nothing in-depth. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: WP:TOOSOON. But, if someone can expand this article with credible citations then I might change my vote. -Hatchens (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG due to not having more than passing mentions in reliable sources Spiderone 12:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.