Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memory Palace

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Memory Palace[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Memory Palace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Of the five citations listed, the two PRP cites and both the substream and mosh cites uncritically republish the band's PR, with long quotation from one of the band members. Wikipedia could wait until the album actually comes out. Efforts to redirect this have failed. For me, I'd need to see cites from Blabbermouth and NME to think there's any general notability here. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I created the page as a redirect to method of loci; if its decided the article should be removed, it should be restored to the original edit rather than deleted. ··gracefool 💬 00:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Band has history of lots of coverage, and there is already some for this album, which will certainly only gain more coverage once it is released. Seacactus 13 (talk) 19:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, agree with Chris Troutman on this. Think this is a bit preliminary for an album that both hasn't released and hasn't garnered significant coverage. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 16:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to Redirect as primary meaning per Gracefool. Any album article should probably be named Memory Palace (2024 album) to distinguish it from the (also redlinked) 2008 album of the same name from Paul Haig and Billy Mackenzie, but it's clearly WP:TOOSOON currently for it to meet NALBUM until there's sufficient RS reviews. Articles covering band announcements are both run-of-the-mill and generally not independent, and sufficiently significant coverage of a creator and/or some of their works is WP:NOTINHERITED by other works. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect. The album is too soon, and I'm sensitive to User:Hydronium Hydroxide's desire to properly disambiguate the resulting redirect. We have no data on this album which might allow it to meet GNG or relevant SNGs. Redirects are cheap (and page history stays intact) as an AtD. BusterD (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Memory_Palace&oldid=1217844026"