Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memorize.AI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ 13:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Memorize.AI[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable flashcard app. Not mentioned in the reference in the article, and no references about the app found. Borderline A7. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. On the fence on this one. Clearly the article needs to be written up in a way that notability can be demonstrated. Ktin (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest issue is that good sourcing likely doesn't exist. Without significant WP:RS coverage, there is no way to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've used flashcard software, and not really heard of this. There's really not much in the way of inddpendent discussion of it, or reviews from the sort of places you would expect. May be *too soon*. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is quite an extensive article about Supermemo, and another on spaced repetition. Can't parse whether it is promo or notable. I wikilinked Supermemo and put it in the Algorithms category, in case that helps anyone. I personally think it is probably too soon for what, as far as I can tell, is Supermemo3 (?) but I have no strong feelings about this either way. My goal was to get it off the uncategorized list and I thought I wwould comment while here. I did not try to wikilink the more common keywords, like UI and Ai and algorithm. Elinruby (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references that mention the software. The only independent ref does not mention Memorize.AI, and a search turned up a few forum posts but no significant WP:RS coverage. While the concepts (spaced repetition) and algorithms (Supermemo) the app employs may be notable, this is not the only software to use either of these, and their use does not contribute to notability of this software.Dialectric (talk) 12:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.