Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memorial Pier Cesare Baretti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ultimately, nobody wants to keep this. Sandstein 08:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Memorial Pier Cesare Baretti[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Dr Salvus 20:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Dr Salvus 20:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 22:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's at least some mention of this in Italian sources. The Italian Wikipedia page wasn't helpful here, can't find anything immediately, but there is at least some claim to notability in spite of the previous vague wave !votes. SportingFlyer T·C 00:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the current drv for another similar AfD but SportingFlyer is hereby made aware that their comment carries no weight whatsoever without specifics. I'm extending as a courtesy but unless specific sources with explanations clearly indicating how they support gng are made then I will close this as delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, everything that's in a robust WP:BEFORE search is only Italian football fan pages, and brief mentions in articles about Coppa delle Alpi. I'm reasonably certain this would pass GNG if anyone has access to an Italian newspaper archive as the tournament was functionally pre-internet, but I can't offer any more help here, unlike the other articles. SportingFlyer T·C 21:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I looked at the Italian language article no references or claims there that meet WP:GNG, I searched for references and did not find anything significant. Jeepday (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Searched for sources since I saw the U.S. played in the tournament and found some sources: [1] I also found a bunch of potential mentions, but can't view most of these - the one I can view is the Guardian, which is just a link to the RSSSF, but let me see if there's not English language sources for Everton: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Also referred to as the "Torneo Baretti." SportingFlyer T·C 16:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like there is something in the way of sourcing, would be worthwhile extending to see if someone can highlight elements in the sources that may satisfy gng. Either way there isn't a clear consensus one way or the other here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 22:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.