Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memeulous

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Memeulous

Memeulous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable person. Lacks coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BIOAmmarpad (talk) 03:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 03:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 03:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 04:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The only reference is a passing mention in a lengthy article about another YouTuber. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above - non-notable. hiàn 21:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete regrettably. The VICE article may however warrant a WillNE article. groig (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not many references mentioned. Notability is an issue, so its a delete.  M A A Z   T A L K  20:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.