Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melvin Smith, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carioca (talk) 02:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melvin Smith, Jr.[edit]

I'm not seeing notability here. Most of it reads like a vanity puff piece, possibly a COI judging by the creator's name. The only claim of importance is being co-founder of Campusbug.com, which doesn't look like nearly enough. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. There might be reliable sources regarding his company, but none on him. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No assertion of notability. Not notable. Comes across as vanity, looks like COI, smells of fish. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Give it to my otters then, they know what to do with fish (namely, eat it). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It looks like Campusbug was AfD'd in July 2006, and recreated a few times after that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity page, person in question isn't notable yet. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Let him hold up a mirror if he wants to reflect on his own unverifiably notable achievements. -- Lenky (talk) 07:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:BIO. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 07:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nah, no notability whatsoever. Alberon (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.