Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melrose Bickerstaff
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Melrose Bickerstaff[edit]
More ANTM models - these ones haven't even finished competing yet.
Also nominating:
- Megan Morris
- Eugena Washington -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 23:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. Bigtop 00:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. - Joshua Johaneman 00:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. MER-C 01:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all...realitycruft. Kill them before it spreads. ♠PMC♠ 02:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. 99% of reality show contestants are not notable. TJ Spyke 02:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. —Khoikhoi 03:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Premature. · XP · 03:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - all of them heavily violate WP:N --Ineffable3000 04:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - Needs more information and notability
- REDIRECT all to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 7 and protect. This is all very crufty. The girls have hardly started the show yet, and here are fans making entries. Please do not allow any more wasting of anyone's time. I had already redirected [some of these] to ANTM7 before, but some crufter keeps undoing these redirects. Protect until the show is at least 9 or 10 weeks in, when they will be whittled down to the last 3, or someone has signed a notable modelling contract. Ohconfucius 14:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all for now but keep open for recreation when there's more info about them. All the other girls from past cycles have pages, and we just went through a huge discussion on whether they should be deleted, and they all ended up being kept. HurriKaty 11:50 PM, 27th September 2006
- Comment I think you've got your facts wrong there. Not all the girls have articles, and in the last AFD batch the articles were either merged or redirected to the relevant cycle. See Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Cassie Grisham. Looking at Template:America's Next Top Model, it appears that about 2/3 of the girls have articles, but I don't think I'd be stretching it to say that some of those articles are stretching it. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 06:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.