Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melodic rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No need for this one to go on any longer, per WP:SNOW Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melodic rock[edit]

No citations, just original research. Someone has taken an adjective and stuck it in front of a defined music genre to try and create something that doesn't exist. Melodic rock is just plain old Rock music. (see WP:NFT)
Would also add List of melodic rock bands to the AfD nom. Libs (talk) 19:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-existant. Seeing as most of the bands named in the article belong to either the hard rock or arena rock genres, a possible redirect to any of those would be plausible. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 22:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced OR an, quite possibly, WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I will take care of this article. It is a valid genre of music that is becoming increasingly popular. Weatherman90 (talk) 00:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It is my favorite genre. Nothing in the arts should ever be deleted. Shootemupwiki (talk) 01:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.187.42.105 (talk) [reply]

Note The link to this article is posted on a Melodicrock messageboard with instructions to come here and post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeeAee (talk • contribs) 03:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note to the closing admin - Transparently suspicious keep. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 02:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Not enough sources or citations. All someone's opinion. The sources are too one sided and their reliability is questionable. You have a section "MelodicRock in the United States" with all of the info from outside the United States.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DeeAee (talk • contribs)
Delete per nom. It's just rock. The list of melodic rock bands can be re-directed to one of the more valid rock lists. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 02:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It describes a type a music. AOR is too broad so MR should exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by StonecoldMR (talk • contribs) 03:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note - New account again. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 12:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should I put a ""not a ballot" template somewhere? Seeing as people are supposedly are being told to vote here via a message board. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Pure fancruft: WP:NFT Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 12:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.