Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa McCool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Symptom targeted intervention. MBisanz talk 12:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa McCool[edit]

Melissa McCool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable researcher who does not meet the requirements of either WP:BIO or WP:PROF. This is the substantial coverage of the subject in reliable sources, but is local news and relatively brief. Other than that, I could only find brief mentions in a very specialist source: [1] [2] SmartSE (talk) 11:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - no sources in article regarding subject. News source above is not only local, but reads like PR. Maybe nephrologynews could be used, but that alone does not establish notability in her field, and with one reliable source, this fails GNG. I'm not finding further sources, but other people with the same name are confusing the issue, so apologies if I missed something. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Sources exist, but the ones I located are either not in-depth or from unreliable sources. I have no experience searching medical indexes for published works so I would have to defer to nominator on that one. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.