Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melinda Hughes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melinda Hughes[edit]

Melinda Hughes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Article relies on self-published sources and a claim of inherited notability. CSD:A7 template has been removed by original author and a new editor whose only contribution has been to this article. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Can't find any inkling of notability, yet. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not notable for a stand alone article on her own; inherited notability, not sufficient. Kierzek (talk) 17:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no independent reliable coverage of subject. Doesn't meet the GNG or BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.