Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne tram B1.2001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne tram B1.2001[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a single tram, sure it is significant, but no way that it would meet WP:GNG. Much more (verified) information is provided at B-class Melbourne tram, and this is pretty much an overview of the vehicles livery. Liamdavies (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC) Liamdavies (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in the article indicates that this is a notable public transport vehicle. WWGB (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is there any possibility of merging it to a relevant article? Perhaps a manufacturer, or the aforementioned B-class Melbourne tram? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added a little more info regarding both 2001 and 2002 to B-class Melbourne tram, this article is redundant and should either be (preferably) deleted or redirected. No matter how significant us tram fans find both B1s, 2001 clearly doesn't meet WP:GNG and too much info about it in B-class Melbourne tram would breach WP:NOTDIRECTORY; the info is still out there at Vicsig.Liamdavies (talk) 11:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.