Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Australian city does a good job of obscuring this in a search, but other than some sort of soil series, the only direct reference was to it being a "road station", whatever that is. Topos and aerials show nothing inconsistent with a 4th class PO in someone's house, so I'm not seeing this as a notable settlement. Mangoe (talk) 19:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nominator's reasoning, and couldn't find any references on Google Scholar. Thanks. JayzBox (talk) 02:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron, Mendocino County, California. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.