Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Müller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ethically (Yours) 07:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Müller[edit]

Melanie Müller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Knappik) Rodolfinho Porto (talk) 17:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Rodolfinho Porto (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Delete. No sign of notability. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 17:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep no valid arguments given for deletion. The subject clearly passes our general notability guideline (significant coverage in virtually all the most notable German news media) as well as the WP:ENT guideline. The comparison with Sarah Knappik carries no weight, the only thing in common is that both of them took part to the same celebrity reality show. Also please note that the nominator is a blatant sockpuppet, who created his account two minutes before nominating this article for deletion. --Cavarrone 17:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Appears to be WP:GNG. Why does someone create an account for no reason other than to AfD this article? VMS Mosaic (talk) 08:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I have not clicked through to any of the referenced sources and so do not know for sure, but considering the titles of the referenced articles in Bild, Focus, and Ok! Magazin, and considering what the other voters have written here, the subject is almost surely notable. —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. She clearly passes GNG due to significant coverage in all notable German news media as participant in Ich bin ein Star – Holt mich hier raus!, which is one of the German TV show with the highest reach, more than 7 million average viewers. To argue there would be "no sign of notability" is clearly wrong. --NiTen (talk) 10:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.