Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie's Theorem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#G3 (blatant hoax). —David Eppstein (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie's Theorem[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed, still no reliable sources for this. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. We are told, "this theorem was first developed and proven by a young physicist named Melanie (last known unknown) at Phillips Exeter Academy, New Hampshire. She is expected to win Nobel Prizes in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics due to her tremendous contribution to the global physics community." There are no sources and none can be found. This fits WP:MADEUP; it may even qualify for speedy delete per WP:CSD#A11 as "obviously invented".--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
speedy or snow delete. Obviously made up as a joke; see also the creator's additions to Chain rule.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Holy crap what is this. No sources, etc, as per the others. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.