Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meisya Siregar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meisya Siregar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is briefly mentioned in some sources, but otherwise appears to fail WP:NACTOR. The idwiki article does not provide sufficient reliable sources either. - Mr X 13:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheMagnificentist 08:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MrX: Siregar Meisya or Sylvie Meis? Both namesakes are of Indonesian origin, but S. Meis is a more beautiful meisje than S. Meisya. In contrast to missis Meisya, miss Meis was the sexiest meisje of her country. To speak the truth, Meisya has performed title roles in notable films, but it's not that important. In addition, the meisje you are talking about is married so that I see a serious reason for WP:Speedy deletion. --Sir Gossip (talk) 08:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P. S. While looking for "Meis" in idwiki, I ran across id:Meisya Siregar (instead of Sylvie Meis). Then I created an English stub for a change. But I don't think it's very important. That's all I think apropos of our talk. --Sir Gossip (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One last time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:06, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of reliable sources, fails GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 19:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.