Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmet Haberal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 11:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmet Haberal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This non-encyclopedic article would need a complete rewrite even IF the subject is notable, which has not been established. Onthegogo (talk) 22:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not appear to be notable and is certainly unencyclopedic. Laurinavicius (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has multiple, reliable sources. But most of the information is unsourced, does not conform to Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines, and should be removed. Sebwite (talk) 01:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. Just moved it to Talk:Mehmet Haberal/Biography. Let's see how notable this subject is with the remainder. Sebwite (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The sources show clear notability on several fronts. Rewriting doesn't involve deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: see the Turkish version[1] 70.52.180.79 (talk) 13:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Agree with Sebwite. See my note [next] Shadowjams (talk) 08:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The timeline section looks like a copy-paste; I don't know if it is, but I suggest it be rewritten. The article's generally in need of attention. Shadowjams (talk) 08:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article looks like written by a 3-year old child. Does it qualify to be a Wikipedia article seriously? camoka4 23:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Ergenekon Terror Organization: There is not a such terror organization, it is just the name of an oparatation made by Turkish state against people who blamed to commit a military coup. --Cemyildiz (talk) 05:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Subject is notable on two fronts, with accelerating Google News hits. Turkish Wikipedia article gets a lot of page views, suggesting that subject is of interest there. Abductive (reasoning) 06:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.