Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Hague

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Hague[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very junior officer (Lieutenant Junior Grade) with no particular reason given as to notability. Once being the most senior female USCG officer serving in the Iraqi theatre is not really enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The sources that are in the article are the only ones I can find. All three of them mention her but none of them are about her. One she is the spokesman for her cutter, one she gets a passing mention about being the most senior USCG officer in the persian gulf and the third confirms she went to high school. None of this is enough to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 16:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Notability not established. ttonyb (talk) 17:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability hasn't been established, and seems unlikely to do so given lack of reliable sources. Skinny87 (talk) 21:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no notability established per WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013^words _deeds 21:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the fact that the subject is/was the highest ranking female Coast Guard officer deployed to the Iraqi theatre is incidental and probably the result of the nature of the Coast Guard's deployment to Iraq rather than anything that the subject has done. Her rank of LTJG is not very high (it is an O-2 equivalent rank), and her position as an executive officer on a ship would not satisfy the elements in WP:MILPEOPLE. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.