Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megha (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Megha (singer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER. ttonyb (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She may be notable; she may not be. However, this article as is, and as created, does not display notability. After a copy-edit to remove the puffery there was still little left to warrant its inclusion. I think that the COI/NPOV reversal of a previous delete nomination by the creator doesn't help either. Acabashi (talk) 19:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leave as is - There are so many singers in Wikipedia who are listed. Why delete this one alone? She has sung for all the famous india music directors. And I have added references for her songs. Some of which are famous songs that millions of people in her country listen to in radio, tv and other sources. If that is not enough, I can add more citable references. Solar345 , 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE most of the external links and references only present a song listing and don't give any reasonable demonstration as to why the Artist is notable. With the obvious WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments discounted, it is not demonstrating to me why the artist is notable and why we should have them in the Wiki. Hasteur (talk) 04:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, has a couple credits to her name but no non-trivial coverage. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.