Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megalon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Godzilla vs. Megalon. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Megalon[edit]

This character does not establish notability independent of Godzilla vs. Megalon through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: To Godzilla vs. Megalon, (pity there's no "list of Godzilla monsters", or is there?) this article is entirely made up of Original Research, geddit? That means if you "trimmed" all the Original Research you'd have nothing but one line left, probably something like; "Megalon (メガロ, Megaro?) is a fictional kaiju (giant monster) featured in the 1973 Japanese tokusatsu film Godzilla vs. Megalon, the thirteenth Godzilla film produced by Toho. A beetle-like arthropod, Megalon is the primary antagonist of the film." Also if it's kept it'll have to lose a picture, two fair use images on an article this small is too many, especially when one of the pics displays the subject so well. Ryan4314 (talk) 07:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Godzilla characters as there is no independent notability outside the series. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge" with Godzilla vs. Megalon. You won't believe this, but this is my all-time favourite movie. That being said, Megalon does not require his own article -- the character has no notability beyond that single film. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect as above, whichever is more appropriate. There's no real world notability asserted here. Cheers, CP 04:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.